Why We Fight

Who-Ruled-India?Who Ruled India?
Worship-of-Gaura-GadadharaThe Worship of Gaura-Gadādhara

by Swami B.G. Narasingha

‘Why We Fight’ by Swami B.G. Narasingha was first published on October 9th 2006. In this article, Swami Narasingha explains why it is the duty of Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇavas, in particular tridaṇḍi-sannyāsīs, fight against māyā and misconception.

Question: I have noticed that many of your Kṛṣṇa Talk articles have a somewhat controversial spin and even a fighting spirit. Do you think this is actually necessary?

Answer: Yes, preaching means fighting – fighting with illusion and misconception. Our weapons are philosophical arguments backed by śāstra and the opinions of previous ācāryas. Preaching means speaking the truth and the nature of truth is that it wants to be found and it wants to fight with ignorance and misconception.

The māyāvādī thinks that when one has realised the truth, no need of expression is necessary — that one should simply remain silent. But a Vaiṣnava is different. The more a Vaiṣnava realises about the Absolute Truth, the more it is important to speak the truth and to challenge misconception. Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura has put it this way –

“The effective silencing of the whole race of pseudo-teachers of religion is the first clear indication of the appearance of the Absolute on the mundane plane. The bona-fide teacher of the Absolute, heralds the Advent of Kṛṣṇa by his uncompromising campaign against the pseudo-teachers of religion.” (Excerpted from the essay ‘Pūtanā’ printed in the January 1932 edition of The Harmonist, or Śrī Sajjana Toṣaṇī.)

An ‘uncompromising campaign against the pseudo-teachers of religion’ means to aggressively fight against misconception. Controversy not only sells, but it strengthens one’s conviction also.

siddhānta baliyā citte nā kara alasa
ihā ha-ite kṛṣṇe lāge sudṛḍha mānasa

“One should not neglect to discuss such conclusions, thinking them to be controversial, since such discussions strengthen the mind. In this way one’s mind becomes attached to Kṛṣṇa.” (Caitanya-caritāmṛta, Ādi 2.117)

The truth wants to be found and when it is found it wants to be spread. Like light that comes forth with incredible speed and force to destroy darkness — the truth penetrates the realm of māyā and destroys the ignorance that binds the conditioned souls.

After all, one should remember that Bhagavad-gītā was spoken on the battlefield of Kurukṣetra and not in a bower in Vṛndāvana. Other gītās are spoken by Kṛṣṇa in Vṛndāvana, but only after having destroyed the demons who threatened the peace and well-being of the Vraja-vāsīs.

Unwillingness to confront philosophical controversy stems from a weakness of heart, a lack of faith, a lack of surrender and a lack of attachment to the Supreme Lord. If we love someone and that person is being vilified or misrepresented then our love will command us to defend that person or to oppose their enemies.

We are sometimes unwilling to engage in philosophical controversies, thinking that such a mood is due to anarthas in our own heart or a manifestation of enmity toward other living entities. However, this may be due to apathy rather than humility.

tasmād ajñānasambhūtaṁ hṛt-sthaṁ jñānāsinātmanaḥ
chittvainaṁ saṁśayaṁ yogam ātiṣṭhottiṣṭha bhārata

“Therefore the doubts which have arisen in your heart out of ignorance should be slashed by the weapon of knowledge. Armed with yoga, O Bhārata, stand and fight.” (Bhagavad-gītā 4.41)

Here is a summary of the engaging spirit of Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta and his Gauḍīya Maṭha mission, given by Śrīla Śrīdhara Mahārāja:

“Our Guru Mahārāja was different. Like Mahāprabhu and Nityānanda Prabhu, he wanted to attack maya and, like a great general, he declared totalitarian war on illusion and even all other existing conceptions of religion. ‘Why is there this misunderstanding and misconception?’ he thought. Everything belongs to Kṛṣṇa: īśāvasyam idaṁ sarvam. It is plain and simple and sweet. How can we think, ‘This is for me, that is for Him?’ Why should we let this misconception stand here at all? Attack it and crush the whole thing!

“He told us, ‘Kīrtana means to preach against misconception. As soldiers, you must go door to door and preach Kṛṣṇa consciousness – Kṛṣṇa’s interest – the Kṛṣṇa conception. If they understand that everything is for Kṛṣṇa, they will be saved. This truth is plain and simple. Why should they not understand this? Try to capture them, to release them from the world of misconception and misunderstanding where they are now suffering from reaction.’” (The Golden Volcano of Divine Love, Chapter 3)

 “No recognition of the jāti-brāhmaṇas, jāti-gosvāmīs, these bābājīs, the Ramakrishna Mission — all foes, no friend! This is Gauḍīya Maṭha. Single-handed they are fighting with everyone existing in the name of religion or non-religion or hodgepodge religion. Single-handed. Our Guru Mahārāja, on the basis of Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura’s findings, took the sword and declared war against the whole world. That was his characteristic.” (Encounters With Divinity, page 26-27)

It is easier to recognise the enemy when the enemy says there is no God, God is dead, life comes from matter and so forth, but it becomes more difficult to recognise the enemy when he comes dressed in the guise of a religious mentor (as is the case with the Yavana and Mleccha preachers).

Such so-called religious mentors are sometimes in the dress of the preacher of a foreign religion and sometimes in the dress of a Vaiṣnava. At this time it is certainly more difficult to identify falsity and therefore only the grace of one’s guru and a prudent understanding of Gauḍīya siddhānta will enable us to understand who is who and what is what.

It is not that we should only engage in philosophical controversy with Christians, atheists and māyāvādīs. Anywhere we find the teachings of Mahāprabhu and our ācāryas being minimised or misrepresented, then we must oppose that. It is the duty of a disciple to struggle to uphold the dignity and teachings of his guru and previous ācāryas.

This duty falls particularly to the sannyāsīs who are called, ‘Mahārāja.’ Mahārāja means ‘great king’ and a sannyāsī is called such not because he accumulates great wealth and rules a kingdom (as is the case with many charlatans), but because his duty is to fight against misconception and give support and shelter to the Vaiṣnava community.

Every Gauḍīya Vaiṣnava sannyāsī receives a tridaṇḍa (staff) at the time of initiation and at the top of that tridaṇḍa is a ‘K’ shaped symbol called the paraśu-mudrā meaning the axe. This is not just any axe, but it is a battle-axe to cut the head of illusion and ignorance. Śrīdhara Mahārāja once said, “It is the emblem of cutting the anarthas of those we preach to, as well as those of the disciple.” (Encounters With Divinity, page 180)

If you are interested in joining the fight against maya and engaging yourself wholeheartedly in the service of your Gurudeva without duplicity or weakness of heart. then you should be interested in taking sannyāsa or assisting a sannyāsī in his preaching work. As an anonymous monk once said, “Take sannyāsa or assist the preaching, but whatever you do, don’t give up the fight!”

Who-Ruled-India?Who Ruled India?
Worship-of-Gaura-GadadharaThe Worship of Gaura-Gadādhara

Share this article!

More Articles by Swami B.G. Narasingha

Preaching is the Essence

Categories: Articles|Tags: , , |

'Preaching is the Essence' was written in 1998 by Swami B.G. Narasingha. In this article, Narasingha Maharaja discusses what is preaching and what a devotee is supposed to preach. Are we to preach and print books about higher topics. Is that real preaching? This article was later printed in the book, 'Śrī Caitanya Saraswat Parampara.'

Mahāprabhu as Prabhupāda

Categories: Articles|Tags: , |

"Mahāprabhu as Prabhupāda" was written by Swami B.G. Narasingha in 1997 as a response to the article, 'Prabhupādānuga or Rūpānuga' by Śrīla Dāsa. Narasingha Maharaja explores the origins of the title 'Prabhupāda' and shows the history of which great personalities has used this title. This article was later edited and included in the book 'Prabhupāda Vijaya'.

Go to Top